<P>I don't get to sit down with my Wall Street Journal until late, imagine my surprise that the Farm Bill made the front page and not one word was mentioned here yesterday....</P><P>I was shady in supporting the bill, after reading the article....my stance is quite clear... I can't support it. </P><P>Its unfortunate that land conservation was mixed in with the bill.... because its the only part that holds any merrit.</P><P>US farm income is expected to reach a record $92.3 billion this year and this bill will open the door for farmers to receive an additional $13 billion in federal subsidies. With farmers earning record profits, there is no need to continue to line their pockets with more money. <BR>
</P><P>The WSJ reports that the average farm household income was $77,654 about 17% more than the average US household income and this number is expected to be about $90,000 this year. The farm bill will continue to provide subsidies to farmers with an income of as much as $2.5 million.<BR>
</P><P>This bill goes WAY past the concept of cutting taxes for the wealthy (which I fully support)... it is literally giving money to the wealthy. With prices rising, and consumers getting hit hard in the pockets there is no reason to continue giving wealthy farmers even more money. To put it into perspective, this would be no different than if the government was handing checks to the CEO's of the oil industries. </P><P>Incidentally, the WSJ article is quite large and there is only 1 mention of conservation. This whole bill is only gaining support because crafty politicians have worked provisions into the bill to gain the support of a ton of people that normally wouldn't support the bill.</P><P>I would really like to see our major lobbiest groups such as DU and Delta to stop supporting the farm bill and to agressivly work to get wetland conservation legislation on a bill of its own... so that wetland conservation can be focused on.</P>

